Federal regulators are increasingly adopting a more crypto-friendly, and more formal approach to bank supervision, one that may have important implications for D&O liability.  Following the President’s August 2025 “Guaranteeing Fair Banking” Executive Order (EO), the Office of the Comptroller of Currency (OCC) issued bulletins in September 2025 to curb “debanking”.  This guidance forces banks to base service decisions on objective risk, rather than social or political motives. Guidance that is further reinforced by the February 26, 2026 Federal Register release and proposal to restrict banking officials from forcing banks to cut ties with clients engaging in controversial but lawful activities.

Continue Reading Debanking, Crypto, and the Next Wave of D&O Exposure

Peloton Interactive, Inc. (Peloton) has faced well-publicized operational and reputational challenges over the past several years. The company’s trajectory, from pandemic-era growth darling to post-pandemic recalibration and product safety scrutiny, has resulted in securities litigation. As previously discussed on the D&O Diary, Peloton successfully defeated a COVID-19-related securities suit at the pleading stage. More recently, the company faced a second securities class action tied to alleged product defects in its flagship bike (Peloton SCA). In a March 31, 2026, decision, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York granted Peloton’s motion to dismiss, rejecting plaintiff shareholders’ attempt to convert operational challenges into actionable securities fraud.

Continue Reading Peloton SCA Dismissed: Product Safety Allegations and D&O Exposure
The Bay of Kotor

The D&O Diary’s European assignment continued last week with a long weekend visit to Montenegro. Montenegro is a small country with rugged mountains and an interesting history, tucked along the Adriatic coast on the Balkan peninsula. It was my first time in the country, and I wasn’t sure what to expect. What I discovered was a pleasant surprise. It turns out, Montenegro is an absolute gem.

Continue Reading Montenegro

Amid signs of a renewed uptick in SPAC activity, courts continue to grapple with D&O insurance coverage issues arising out of older de-SPAC transactions. In a March 30, 2026,  decision involving the de-SPAC of View Operating Corporation (View), the Delaware Superior Court held, in part, that View’s D&O policy “public offering” exclusion did not apply to preclude coverage for claims arising out of a de‑SPAC transaction and that additional payment conditions could not be imposed unless expressly stated in the policy.

Continue Reading Delaware Court Rejects “Public Offering” Exclusion in De-SPAC Coverage Dispute

The following guest post examines the resolution of class certification motions in securities class action lawsuits during 2025; considers the parties’ economic arguments in support of or in opposition to class certification; and analyzes the courts evaluation of those arguments. The article is written by Andrew Roper, Mame Maloney, Brendan Rudolph, and Ravi Sinha, Principals at The Brattle Group, and Aidan Kutner, an Associate at The Brattle Group. We would like to thank the authors for allowing us to publish their article as a guest post on our site. Here is the authors’ article.

Continue Reading Guest Post: Key Trends in 2025 Class Certification Decisions: Fraud-on-the-Market Under Fire

A new study highlighted on the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, and posted by Subodh Mishra, Global Head of Communications at ISS STOXX, on Tuesday, April 14, 2026, quantifies how cyber incidents can have sustained and measurable negative impacts on shareholder value. The report, based on research conducted by ISS STOXX and ISS-Corporate (the study), analyzed cyber incidents among companies in the Russell 3000 over a multi-year period. Its findings are stark: companies experiencing significant cyber incidents underperform the broader market by approximately 5% on average over a three-year time period. 

Continue Reading Cyber Incidents’ “Long Tail” Impact on Shareholder Value

On April 10, 2026, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) became the first company to settle with the Trump Administration to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Acts (FCA) by implementing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) as part of its hiring practices.  As we have discussed in prior posts, this Administration has clearly signaled that it would use the FCA as part of its an anti-DEI campaign and that, as of late 2025, the DOJ had already launched investigations of DEI consideration in hiring or promotion at major U.S. companies.  

Continue Reading The IBM DEI False Claims Act Settlement and the D&O Risk Implications

The D&O Diary is on assignment this week in Europe, with the first stop in the German city of Frankfurt. Frankfurt is the premier financial hub of continental Europe, serving as the seat of the European Central Bank and the heart of the German banking industry. I always enjoy visiting Frankfurt, but there was something about this visit in particular that made me reflect on how much my views about Germany have changed over the years — and how much I enjoy visiting Germany — as discussed below.

Continue Reading Frankfurt

In February, I noted an emerging securities litigation trend involving pump-and-dump schemes characterized by thin public float, retail investor participation, and the amplifying effects of social media. Three subsequent pump-and-dump securities filings in February and March 2026, along with a recent federal court ruling involving social media platform liability, provide further evidence that these risks may be accelerating. Taken together, these developments have important implications for D&O liability exposure and for underwriters evaluating risks associated with low-float issuers and companies whose securities trading activity may be influenced by online promotional activity.

Continue Reading Follow-On Developments in Pump-and-Dump Litigation

One of the perennial management liability insurance coverage issues is whether a policy’s contractual liability exclusion precludes coverage for related tort claims filed alongside claims for breach of contract. Often, these issues turn on the specific wording of the exclusion involved. A recent insurance coverage decision from the Northern District of Illinois addressed these issues in the context of an underlying lawsuit involving both a breach of contract claim and a claim for tortious interference with contract. As discussed below, the court concluded, based on the specific language involved, that the exclusion did not preclude coverage for the tortious interference claim.

The Court’s March 31, 2026, opinion can be found here. An April 9, 2026 LinkedIn post about the court’s decision by Paul Curley of the Kaufman, Borgeest & Ryan law firm can be found here.

Continue Reading Contract Exclusion Does Not Bar Coverage for Tortious Interference Claim